726    Iconoclastic Controversy www.generationword.com
 - Occurred
     in the East
- Arts
     have always viewed with different opinions by Christians
- Only “Christian” art  
- No art at all
- Avoid visual representations
-1-To capture the idea of flesh being given God’s splendor
Mary (flesh) was crowned in Gold (promised redemption) sitting under gilded
arches being approached by a shining winged creature.
-2- To show the unfavorable way this portion of
Christianity occurred in history one would paint Mary as ordinary in ordinary
surroundings.
 - 680       A new controversy broke out:  The use of icons or images.
- It
     was a debate over what was sacred or holy and deserved worship.
- The
     clergy were set apart and so holy. 
     Also, church buildings, martyrs and heros of faith such as hermits
     and monks were set apart.
- Martyrs
     were set apart and so holy or “saints.”
- The
     holiness of a saint was evaluated on the miracles that took place at their
     tomb, relics, or icon (image)
- 700’s   By the 700’s every city had at least one
     famous saint that was worshipped and became the protector of that city.
- The
     government and church encouraged this.
- Icons
     began to multiply
- Christians
     then limited their devotion to one location such as:
* 
St. Demetrius of Thessalonica
* 
The miraculous Christ-icon of Edessa,
 Syria
* Miracle working icon of Mary in Constantinople
 - Most
     Christians placed faith in the icon and made no spiritual connection, thus
     idolatry.
- Christ’s
     image began to replace the image of the emperor on coins (685-711)
- Emperor
     Leo III (717-741) attacked the use of icons 
- In
     Eastern Asia Minor bishops preached
     against icons.
- 726
     - Leo held off the Muslim attack on Constantinople
     and then declared his oppositioin to icons
- A mob
     murdered the messenger sent to replace the icon of Christ at the imperial
     gates
- Whole
     sections of the empire rebelled againsts Leo
- 730
     – Leo issued an edict to destroy public icons
- The
     Bishop of Rome condemned those who destroyed the images.  The destroyers were called iconoclast.
- The
     Roman Bishop got military support from the Franks
- Leo
     wanted the cross, the book, and the elements of Lord’s supper to be holy
     along with clergy and dedicated buildings.
- Leo’s
     son argued the only true icon’s were the bread and wine because they were
     the same substance as Christ.
754   Iconoclastic Synod of Constantinople
·        
During this council a three fold anathema was
pronounced on the advocates of   
image-worship.
·        
The clergy submitted, but the monks who
manufactured the pictures denounced the emperor and were subjected to
imprisonment, flagellation, mutilation and death. 
 
SEE INSERT: Picture’s of
Crucified Christ
 
787    Nicean Council II
 - The
     eighth church council
- Sanctioned
     Image worship
- Leo
     the IV kept the laws against icon worship but his beautiful wife from Athens, Irene
     tolerated and then favored icon worship.
- Irene
     raised the persecuted monks to the highest dignities removed the
     iconoclastic imperial guard with one agreeing to her views.
- Irene
     convened the eighth church council. 
     It consisted of eight sessions from September 24-October 23 in 787.
- The
     Nicene Council nullified the decrees of the iconoclastic Synod of
     Constantinople in 754 (which later was rejected as a true church council)
- Acceptable
     images were: the cross, pictures of Christ, pictures of the Virgin Mary,
     pictures of angels, pictures of saints, the gospel books, relics of
     saints.
- They
     could be drawn in color or composed of Mosaic materials.
- They
     could be in churches, houses in streets, on walls, tables vessels and
     vestments.
- Homage
     may be paid to them by kissing, bowing burning incense, saying prayers,
     burning candles. 
- The
     honor paid to the image was a representation of the honor paid to the true
     reality in heaven.
- The
     scriptures used for defense were Ex.25:17-22; Ezek. 41:1,15,19; Hebrews
     9:1-5.
- Also
     alleged testimonies of now dead church fathers, mostly falsified and
     alleged miracles performed by images was used to defend the practice.
- Large
     numbers of former iconoclast repented and prayed together, “We all have
     sinned, we all have erred, we all beg forgiveness.”  And they worshipped the images.
- During
     this council an image was brought in and kissed by all the delegates.  At the conclusion of the council the
     delegates said together: 
“Thus we believe. 
This is the doctrine of the apostles. Anathema upon all who do not
adhere to it, who do not salute the images, who call them idols, and who charge
Christianity with idolatry.”
 - The
     Second Council of Nicea is far below the first both morally and
     doctrinally.
- It
     determined the character of worship in the Eastern church for all time and
     so is still significant.
- It’s
     decision is binding on the Roman church which had sent two papal delegates
     and is defended in its writings.
- The
     protestants disregard this council because:
  - It
      violates the second commandment
- It
      violates the practice of apostolic Christianity
- The
      superstitions that accompanies it.
- The
      miracle-workings done by the Madonnas in the 19th and 20th
      centuries.
 
      The positive
affects of this council is that it has saved Christian art.  If the iconoclast would have been successful
in their extreme methods there would be no Christian painting, sculpture,
ect.  It would have affected music and
other expressions of the Christian faith.
 
To prevent her son from being capable of reigning and to
maintain her power in the East Irene had her son’s plucked out one night as he
slept.  She ruled for five more years and
then was overthrown and exiled.  She
spent the rest of her life working for a living.
 
800  Charlemagne Crowned Emperor 
 - The
     divided kingdom consisted of an Emperor in the East and a ruling pope in
     the West.
- The
     Popes claimed power in 590 and continually increased their claim.
- Arian
     Christians called Lombards attacked Rome
     several times.  The pope needed
     military support and called on the Franks to be his ally.  This union would shape Christianity in
     the Middle ages.
- The
     Franks had invaded Gaul from their homeland along the Rhine River.  The Gaul’s
     had adopted Roman culture after Julius Caesar’s invasion.  This Roman culture now went to the
     Franks upon their invasion of Gaul.
- Clovis (466-510) united the territory from the
     Rhine down into France.  This helped bring stability to the area.
- Clovis accepted
     Christianity (496) due to:
* His wife                   * 
Supernatural aid in battle
 - Clovis’ sons were
     weak and just partied in the palace when they came to power so the kingdom
     was run by the mayor’s of the palace.
- Pepin
     was the first mayor (687-714)
- It
     was handed to an illegitimate son of his called Charles Martel
     (689-741)
- Charles
     Martel as the warrior saved the West for Christianity and the pope knew
     it.
- Muslims
     had taken Spain and
     were threatening Europe but were defeated at the battle of Tours in 732.
 
SEE INSERT: Map – “Muslim Expansion, 622-900
 
 - Martel
     supported Boniface’s work in evangelizing the tribes beyond the Rhine
- Martle’s
     two sons reigned after him.  One
     joined a monastery leaving Pepin the Great to rule as king.
- Pope
     Zacharias needed help against the Arian Lombards  in 754 and 756.
- Pepin
     donated land in central Italy
     to the pope.   This was known as the
     Donation of Pepin.  It remained the
     pope’s until 1870.
- About
     this time a book appeared called the “Donation of Constantine.”  Which tells the story of Constantine’s conversion and how the grateful Constantine made a
     huge land grant and special rights to the Bishop of Rome.
- It
     was a forgery but it was not proven until several centuries later.  The popes did and still use it to defend
     their claim on land, power and position.
- In
     the book Constantine
     was healed of leprosy and baptized by the bishop Sylvester. In return Rome was to have
     precedence over all the other churches and this bishop was to be the
     supreme bishop.  Constantine left the imperial palace,
     imperial clothing, and imperial rank to the pope.  Constantine
     then moved East so as not to interfere with the Pope and his gift.
 
SEE INSERT: Picture of Constantine
with Leprosy.
 
 - The
     next ruler was Pepin the Great’s son Charlemagne (742-814).
- Charlemagne
     began to reign in his father’s place in 768.
- Charlemagne
     was crowned Emperor of the Roman’s by the Pope in 800.
- Charlemagne
     would influence everything in Western Europe.
- Charlemagne
     was 7 feet tall.  He had a large
     strong body, a bright face and long white hair.
 
SEE INSERT: “Church and State, 754-1309”
SEE INSERT: Map – “Empire of Charlemagne”
 
869   Constantinople
Council IV
 - The Ninth Church Concil
- It
     brought about the final schism between the East and West
- Between
     800 – 1054 the Western church experienced an inner renewal that gave it
     strength to deal with its existence in the shadow of the Holy
      Roman Empire
- The
     Eastern church became conscious of this and other differences between the
     East and West.
- The
     renewal of the Western church was not always spiritual, but often
     strength:
A. 
Donation of Constantine – a
forgery credited to Constantine tells the story
of Constantine
being healed of leprosy and baptized by the Bishop of Rome.  In return Constantine
gave the Bishop central Italy,
the palace, clothing and the imperial symbol. 
Constantine
then moved East.
B. 
A collection of false decrees by earlier roman bishops.  These asserted the roan Bishop (Papa) was
supreme over all bishops.  Also, it
claimed that the church was free from secular control.  
C. 
Doctrine of Mass.  A
controversy reguarding the nature of Christ’s presence in communion upset the
Western church.   Any claim that the
Lord’s super was a sacrifice by the priest was additional power to the pope,
the priesthood and their hierarchy.  They
alone had power to perform this miracle. 
(In 1215 at the Council of Trent the church officially accepts this
view.)  In 831 Paschasius Radbertus began
to teach that by a miracle the substance of the bread and wine were changed
into the body and blood of Christ.  The
book: “Of the Body and Blood of the Lord.”
D. Monastic Reform carried
out by the Cluniac monasteries.
 
 
 
909   Abbey of Cluny Founded
 - Monastic
     reforms by the founders of the abbey of Cluny called Cluniac Reforms.
- These
     monasteries contributed to the supremacy of the papacy.
- By
     the 900 the monasteries had become wealthy and corrupt.
- The
     earlier ideas of service had been replaced with:
1) 
ideal of individual salvation
2) 
an easy life of wealth in the monastery
 - In
     Eastern France at Cluny
     in 909 a monastery was founded that was free from secular or episcopal
     control.  It was self-governed and
     under the pope’s protection.
- Two
     leaders (Abbots) did their work so well in this monastery that many others
     reorganized along the same line. 
     The leaders were:                                                                       1)  Berno (910-926)                2) Odo (927-944)
- These
     Abbots would appoint the leaders in new monasteries and oversee them.
- This
     organized all the monasteries under the Abbot of Cluny who worked with the
     pope.
- The
     Cluniac leaders called for reform:
1) 
The condemned simony (buying and selling of church offices for money)
2) 
They condemned nepotism (the practice of showing favoritism to relatives
in    appointments to church positions.)
3) 
Celibacy – the clergy could no longer keep concubines nor could they
marry.    Their
attention was not to be to family but to the church.
4) 
Ascetic life was restored.
5) 
Good schools were formed.  These
schools made Latin the common language   of
the middle ages.
 - The
     Cluniac monasteries resulted in:
a) 
Missionary Efforts             b)  Crusades against Muslims in the Holy Land
 - This
     order of monasteries came to an end in 1790.
 
800’s                   Vikings Invade Europe
 - The
     splendid Frankish Empire of Charlemagne began to dissolve quick at his
     death because the empire was dependent on his personal genius and energy.
- Decline
     of Holy Roman Empire
A)  Teutonic Principle – Emperors land
divided between sons.  Charlemagne’s son
began this and had to divide the empire into three sections.  They warred until it was divided into Germany and France with a 100 mile section
between them in 843.
B)  Feudalism – Decline of city life and
trade forced people back to the farm. 
Public power went into private hands of land owners.  There were three groups:
            1-
Protectors, the land owners known as knights.
            2-
Producers, the economic foundation known as serfs.
            3-
Prayers, the priestly class
o       This
was a system of political organization based on land possession and served as a
system of justice and order during the period of the decline of central
government.
o       A
large amount of land in Western Europe was
held by the church.  Pious or repentant
men seeking to atone for a life of sin lift lands to the church.
o       The
church (abbots and bishops) would give land to knights in exchange for
protection.
o       The
church became secular and concerned about land.
o       The
people faced a choice:  
1 - Be loyal to the temporal lord
on who’s land he lived and worked
2 – Be loyal to the
spiritual  lord, the pope.
o       This
became a breeding ground for bad doctrine.
C)  Vikings from Sweeden,
Denmark, and Norway invaded
any town or monastery along the coast or on the shores of rivers.  This led to the rapid decline of the fallen Holy Roman Empire. 
Vikings settled in England
and eventually merged with Anglo-Saxons. 
The Christina culture of England
was set back.
 
936   Otto the Great
 - The
     idea of the Holy Roman Empire survived
     even though it fell.
- In Germany
     division was great due to the interest and topography
* In the north the rivers flowed
north and the land was a plain.
* In the south the rivers flowed
south and the land was mountainous
 - Tribal
     divisions and feudalism led to decentralized authority
- The
     need for unity came with northern invaders and the tribal dukes unified.
- 919 –
     Henry the Fowler, duke of Saxony, was
     made ruler.  He drove back the
     Northmen.
- 936 –
     Henry’s Son, Otto, became king.  
a) 
Otto made the dukes his vassals
b) 
Otto  took over the church and
began appointing the bishops and abbots.
 - Otto
     over extended his interest by becoming involved in affairs over the Alps
 in the church in Rome.
 - Otto
     went to Italy to aid
     the pope in battle and was crowned emperor of the Holy Roman Empire in 962
     which united all of central Europe until
     Napoleon in 1806.
- For
     the next 200 years the Roman church had weak leaders and the German
     emperors crossed the Alps to help bring
     order out of the Chaos.
- 996
     – Otto III put down a faction of Roman nobles and forced the election of
     his cousin Bruno as Pope Gregory V.
- Eventually
     Innocent III will humiliate the German emperor.
 
SEE INSERT:  Map –
“Empire of Otto the Great”
 
1054          The
East-West Schism
 
SEE INSERT: Map – “The Schism of 1054”
 
 - In
     330 Constantine moved the Roman Empire
     capital to Constantinople.
- In
     395 Theodosius place East and West administration under different heads.
- In
     490 the Roman Empire falls in the West
- The
     fall of the West left the Emperors in the Est with no Emperor in the
     West.  The pope (bishop of Rome) alone was left
     in the West and was too far away to be controlled by the East.
- Comparison:
* 
In the East . . .the emperor was almost a pope
* 
In the West. . .the pope was almost an emperor
 - The
     differences between the West and East:
1) 
Intellectual outlooks were different:
a) 
Latin West spent time considering practical matters of polity.   They had little trouble formulating orthodox
doctrine.
b) 
Greek mind in the East was more interested in solving theological
problems along philosophical lines. 
Between 325-451 most theological problems arose in the East.  The same issues were not problems in the
West.
                        2)  Cultural differences:
                                    a)  Celibacy differed – Eastern clergy married
                                    b)  Beards –clergy in East had to wear a beard.
                                    c)  Language – East was Greek, West was
Latin.  This led to                                                                       misunderstandings.
                        3)  Theological differences:
                                    In
867 – Photius, patriarch in Egypt,
charged Nicholas I and                                                church in West with heresy because
the West had the “filoque”                                           clause
in its Nicene Creed.
                                                (In
589 at the Council of Toledo III the words “and the                                                       Son” or “filoque” were added to the Nicene
Creed after                                                      “Holy
Spirit that proceeded from the father and the Son.”                                                        The
Western church since had insisted on the deity of the                                                           Holy
Spirit.)
                        4)  History of conflict:
                                    *  Easter Conflict, 150 AD
                                    *  Iconoclastic Controversy, 700 AD
                                    *  East destroyed or limited the power of monks
                                    *  Pope Nicholas tried to interfere with a
church appointment in the                                                East around 850
SEE INSERT:  “The
Primary Causes of the East-West Schism of 1054”
 - In
     1054 Michael Cerularius, Patriarch of Constantinople condemned the West
     for using unleaven bread in the Eucharist. 
     Pope Leo IX sent Cardinal Humbert to end the dispute.  During discussion the differences
     widened between the church in Rome and the
     Church in Constantinople.  On July 16, 1054, Cardinal Humbert
     excommunicated the East.  Not to be
     outdone the patriarch anathematized the pope of Rome and his followers.  For the first time universal unity was
     broken.
- On
     Dec. 7, 1965 the mutual excommunication was removed by Pope Paul VI and
     Athenagoras.
 
1066    William the Conqueror King of England
 - The
     Vikings conquered England
     under the leadership of William the conqueror.
 
1000    Seljuk Turks occupy the Holy Land
 
 
1073 Pope Gregory VII (Hildebrand) 
 - Papacy
     had great temporal power between 1054-1305 that included:                                   Hildebrand                  Innocent
     III                Crusades                                             Universities                 Scholasticism              Obedient
     Monks
- Downfall
     is going to be nationalism in France
     and England
- Hildebrand
     spent 20 years (five popes in 1053-1073) as a humble servant of the pope
     trying to obtain powers for the pope. 
     
- Hildebrand
     will then spent the next 12 years (1073-1085) reigning as the pope with
     those powers.
- In
     the 300’s certain churches had been designated as exclusive baptism
     sites.  The pastors became known as Cardinal
     Priest at these locations.
- In
     the 200’s Rome
     had been divided into districts to do charity work.  These pastors became known as Cardinal
     Deacons.
- Bishops
     near Rome
     were called Cardinal Bishops.
- These
     three groups became the Pope’s College of Cardinals.
- Leo
     IX – Hildebrand was placed in charge of the Roman Finances, and thus over
     the Cardinals.
- Nicholas
     II -  Hildebrand helped have the
     ecclesiastical legislation taken from the population of Rome. 
     The Cardinal Bishops would choose a candidate (while consulting the
     Cardinal priests and deacons) for pope. 
     Then the people could vote. 
     This prevented corruption from the German emperors, etc.
- 1073
     – Hildebrand was unanimously elected as Pope Gregory VII as a result of
     the people shouting “Let Hildebrand be bishop.”
- Hildebrand’s
     (Gregory VII) goal: The pope as absolute theocracy in spiritual and
     temporal power.
- Hildebrand
     (Gregory VII) wanted no civil power to dominate the church.
- But,
     Hildebrand (Gregory VII) wanted the church to control civil power.
- He
     stopped these practices:                                                                                                    1)
     Lay investiture – where church leaders where appointed by their feudal                               lords.                                                                                                               2)
     Simony (buying and selling church offices)                                                           3)  Failure to enforce celibacy, to help men
     focus on and reform the                                    church
- After
     Hildebrand’s (Gregory VII) death they found his writing “Dictatus Papae”
     which was a document with his letters that develops papal supremacy over
     temporal rulers and over the Roman Church.
- The
     “Dictatus Papae” said:
a) 
Roman church founded by God alone
b) 
Pontiff alone to be called “universal”
c) 
Pope had full power over all bishops
d) Only the popes feet should be
kissed by “all princes”
e) Pope could “depose emperors”
f) Pope could release all subjects
of evil rulers
 
 
1000’s
                Scholasticism
 - Up
     until the time of the pope’s absolute power education took place in
     monasteries.  The pope supported the
     founding of universities.
- In
     these universities debates were carried on which reawakened intellectual
     life in Europe and helped expand the vocabulary
     and depth of Christian thought.  
- An
     example:  Discussion revolved around
     the meaning of Jesus words “This is my body, this is my blood.”  A student named Berengar said that a
     real and true change takes place in these elements but the change is spiritual.  Lanfranc and other theologians debated
     him saying it was an actual change although the “accidents” (touch, taste,
     sight and smell) of the bread and wine remain the same.
Lafranc won the debate and the term
“transubstantiation” took on Lanfranc’s definition.  Berengar was condemned and forced to disown
his views.
 - Scholasticism
     was an age when the church controlled all education  and they carried on their thinking
     against the background of what had gone before (classical philosophy of
     ancient Greece,
     the Bible and the teaching of the earliy Christian writers.)
- The
     great schoolmen (Anselm                  Peter Abelard,        Hugh of St Victor,                                          Peter Lombard    Albert the Great       Thomas Aquinas                                            Duns
     Scotus)
- This
     movement put logic into faith.  They
     organized the faith into a system.
- The
     men of scholasticism did not necessarily believe the same thing but
     instead thought and reasoned the same way.
- The
     theology that interested these men was basically philosophical.
- Thomas
     Aquinas:                                                                                                                  a)
     was considered in his own day a dangerous innovator                                                b) his work is
     said to be a lake with many streams flowing into and from                                    but that
     his work by itself is no water source.                                                            c)  He was original in the way he pulled
     together all the previous teaching                           and the rigorous
     way in which he explored question after question.             d)  Aquinas
     would quote everyone who had gone before, pool together all                                 their ideas
     and then and only then would he produce his view.
- These
     men were no fools.  They were
     rigorous, complex, and had great thinking capacity.  They belong to the intellectual giants
     of humanity
- The
     Problems:                                                                                                                         a)  They were often attempting the
     impossible.                                                         b)  Much of their work was devoted to
     reconciling what can not be                                        reconciled.                                                                                                       c)  They recognized the church fathers’
     writings as infallible                                    d)  They force Greek philosophy to fit
     scriptural study.  Often one or the                                 other must
     change to fit.  In this case you no
     longer have                                                philosophy
     nor scripture.                                                                                 e)  They were operating with out-dated
     concepts.  Many of the questions                                 that they
     wrestled with have turned out to be pseudo-questions in                           the light of our scientific view of the world.  The questions they                              asked had
     theological bearing but their preoccupation with them                                   hindered
     the hearing of the scriptural message.
- A
     boy could begin his university education at the age of 12.  They only need to know Latin.
- The
     privilege of lecturing in theology was not granted until a man was 35.
- Universities
     had 3,000-4,000 students.
- These
     men desired to confirm all that they had been taught.  They made no original contribution to
     exegesis and biblical theology. 
- They
     wanted to organize the doctrines  in
     an orderly system called “summa theologiae”
- They
     went to the extreme of introducing into their discussions every imaginable
     question.  These questions, if
     answered, would do no good except to satisfy a prurient curiosity.
- Anselm
     gives the best example of treatises on distinct subjects such as the
     existence of God, the necessity of the Incarnation, and the fall of the
     devil.
- Peter
     the Lombard produced the most clear
- Thomas
     Aquinas the most complete and finished systematic bodies of divinity.
- They
     began with the principle that faith precedes knowledge.  As Anselm said, “I believe that I may understand;
     I do not understand that I may believe.” And quoted Isaiah 7:9, “If you
     will not believe, you surely shall not be established.”
 
SEE INSERT: “Schools of Scholasticism”
SEE INSERT: “The Theology of Scholasticism”
SEE INSERT:“Arguments for the Existence of God- the Five Ways of Thomas
Aquinas”
 
1093    Anselm 
 
 
1096    First Crusade
 
SEE INSERT: “The Crusades” 
SEE INSERT: Picture of Crusades
 
1100    Bernard of Clairvaux
 
1123    First
Lateran Council
 - Also
     known as Rome Council I
- It is
     the 10th Church council
- Decided
     that bishops are appointed by Popes
 
1139    Second Lateran Council
 - Also
     known as Rome Council II
- It
     was an effort to heal the East and West Schism
 
1100    Second
Crusade
 
1100    University of Oxford Founded
 
1100    Notre Dame
de Paris is built
 
1176    Peter Waldo
founds the Waldensians
 - 1140-1215
- A
     Wealthy merchant who read translations of the Gospel and experienced a
     spiritual conversion in 1176
- Imitating
     St. Alexis Waldo left his family, gave his goods to the poor and took a
     vow of poverty.
- Many
     followed his example in Lyons.
- He
     became an itinerant preacher and vigorously campaigned against the
     worldliness of the Church.
- He
     organized his followers into two classes: the Perfect and the Friends (or,
     Believers)
- He
     translated the Latin Bible into the languages of people.  
- Pope
     Alexander III approved his lifestyle at the Third Lateran Council in 1179,
     but forbid him to preach without local approval.
- They
     were known as the “Poor Men of Lyons” and lived poor to condemn the
     churches wealth.
- Waldo
     ignored Alexander III and continued to preach and was condemned as a
     heretic.
- This
     group has survived into modern times in Europe, North and South America.
- The
     Waldensian church as a modern membership of about 35,000.