  
  
   
  
  Lesson 29 of 50 - Church History (part seven of eight) 
  
  
    | Written | 
    Online Audio or Video   | 
    TAKE THE TESTS -  
      | 
   
  
     Written Notes  
      - 1415  
               
              Review Points 
               
               
              Questions 
               
              Supplementary Material 
        Source Books  | 
    2004 mp3 Audio  
      2009 mp3 Audio  
      Real Player Video  | 
    Chapter Tests: 
    Sect F, Ch  
          
      Essay Tests: 
        Sect F, Ch   | 
   
  
    
     
    Church History 1100-1300, 
    Crusades, Waldo, Scholasticism, Aquinas, Mystics (2011) 
    audio .mp3 - Church History 1100-1300, 
Crusades, Waldo, Scholasticism, Aquinas, Mystics | 
    
     
    Church History 1300-1517,  
    Mysticsim, Wyclif, Avignon, 
    Hus, Inquisition    (2011) 
    audio .mp3 - Church History 1300-1517,  
Mysticism, Wyclif, Avignon, Hus, Inquisition | 
      
      
     
    
  | 
   
  
    
      
       
Church History 1200 (2017) | 
    
      
       
Church History 1300 (2017) | 
    
      
       
Church History 1415-1522  (2017)  | 
   
 
 Church History (part seven): The Reformation  
1324-1384     John  Wyclif 
  - The Morning Star of the Reformation
 
  - He was of Saxon blood and studied at Oxford.
 
  - He several appointments including one from the       king
 
  - In 1366 he was one of the king’s chaplains
 
  - In 1374 Wyclif went for the king to negotiate       peace with France and       to meet with the pope’s agents on filling of ecclesiastical appointments       in England.
 
  - ON his return to England he began to speak of       religious reform.
 
  - He preached in Oxford       and London       against the pope’s secular sovereignty. 
 
  - IN one of his tracts he called the bishop of Rome “the anti-Christ, the proud, worldly priest of Rome, and the most       cursed of clippers and cut-purses.”  
 
  - Wyclif said that the pope “has no more power in       binding and loosing than any priest.”
 
  - In 1378 he was tried for heresy
 
  - He then began to write in English the Scriptures
 
  - He organized traveling preachers to take his       message
 
  - He rejected transubstantiation, priestly       absolution in the confessional and indulgences.
 
  - His followers were called ‘Lollards’ and were       arrested
 
  - He suffered a stroke in 1382 that left him       partially paralyzed
 
  - While saying mass in his church he was struck       again with paralysis and died two days later on Dec. 29, 1384.
 
  - Wyclif was said to have lit a fire that would       never go out.
 
 
  
1305-1378     Popes  at Avignon 
  - The increase in the number of sects,       nationalism, and the wider spread of money began the decline of the papacy
 
  - England and France were at odds with the       pope.  The clash centered not on       lands as in the past but on the accumulation of money.  
 
  - The church had to resort to demanding tithes       from the churches or risk excommunication
 
  - In France King Philip the Fair       levied taxes on the French clergy of one-half their annual income.
 
  -  In 1296       Pope Boniface threatened excommunication
 
  - Philip then forbid the exportation of gold to Rome
 
  - Pope Boniface countered by stating the most       far-reaching claims ever made by medieval papacy.   He said that Christ, being both a king       and a priest, had committed to Peter not one key but two, and not one       sword but two – the temporal as well as the spiritual.  Peter had renounced for himself the       actual use of the temporal sword, but had delegated it to kings to be       employed under papal direction.  
 
  - 1303 some of Philip’s men captured the pope in       his summer residence near Rome       and tortured him until he died.
 
  - The papacy was then transferred from Rome to Avignon a       little town in Southern France.  This city as to be the papal residence       from 1305 until 1378.  
 
  - This was known as the Babylonian captivity
 
 
  
1378   Great  Schism of Papacy 
  - Other countries were rejecting the papacy as a       French institution.
 
  - Pope Gregory XI went back to Rome       but his cardinals refused to go with him and elected another pope in Avignon, Clement VII
 
  - Gregory XI was succeeded by Urban VI in Rome who then       created a new college of cardinals.
 
  - There were now two popes and two sets of       cardinals.
 
  - The conflict continued until both sets of       cardinals were so disgusted that they met together with out either pope in       1409, calling their two popes “Benefictus” and ”Errorius” and deposed them       both. 
 
  - They elected a new pope
 
 
1380   Wyclif’s  English Translation of the NT 
1414-1418     Constance  Council 
  - 17th Church Council
 
  - Heal Papal schism
 
  - Burn Hus
 
 
1415   John Hus  Burnt at stake 
  - He began preaching to the people of Bohemia in their       own language 
 
  - He criticized Catholicism at first on a moral       basis.
 
  - He upbraided the luxury and license of the       bishops and pope and drew a graphic picture of Christ riding on a donkey       and the pope on a stallion being kissed on his feet.
 
  - Hus movement restored the cup to the laity and       not just to the priest
 
  - Students at the University of Prague       burned the papal bull of indulgence and were executed.  Hus protested and was sent into       retirement and wrote “On the Church”
 
  - At the Council of Constance the council proposed       to examine Hus.  
 
  - Hus welcomed the suggestion and was guaranteed a       safe journey there and back.
 
  - Upon arrival Hus was shocked by the blatant       immorality of the priests.
 
  - Hus was imprisoned
 
  - Hus was accused of teaching the doctrines that       he did not teach. 
 
  - He was burned by the council and said while       burning, “O Christ, thou son of the living God, have mercy upon me.  O thou, who wast born of the virgin       Mary. . .”
 
  - Even the dirt around the stake was dug up and       removed so there would be no relics.
 
 
1431-1449     Basel Council  
  - 18th Church Council
 
  - Reform the Church
 
 
1453   Turks  Capture Constantinople 
  
    - After years of  standing against Muslim pressure the Christian city of Constantinople fell to the Turks on May 29,  1453
 
    - This ended the  last stand of the former Roman Empire in the form of the Byzantine Empire and  gave way to the Ottoman Empire
 
    - This date is  seen as the end of the Middle Ages.  
 
    - The Greek  scholars of the Byzantine Empire migrated into Europe  which began the Renaissance
 
   
 
1300-1600     Renaissance 
  - The Renaissance began a revival of learning       based on classical culture of ancient Greece       and Rome preserved in the Greek language of       the Byzantine Empire that entered Italy       with Muslim invasion of the eastern church and the ultimate fall of Constantinople in 1453 
 
  - Michelangelo, Erasmus, Raphel
 
 
1456   Johan Gutenberg 
  - Printing press invented
 
  - Prints first Bible
 
 
1478   Spanish  Inquisition 
  - In an attempt to rid the country of Spain       of all heresy against the Catholic church.
 
  - Spain sacrificed Jews, Moors (Muslims living in Spain),       and Protestants.
 
  - No church organization has ever been more       unrestricted than the Spanish Inquisition.
 
  - It was in agreement with the papal Inquisition       established by Innocent III in its aim to eradicate heresy.  But it was under the direction of a       tribunal appointed by the Spainish king and answerable to him.  They were completely independent of the       bishops.
 
  - The first sitting of the tribunal in 1481 result       in six men and woman being cremated alive.
 
  - It began with the Edict of Grace which gave       heretics a period of 30-40 days to turn themselves in.
 
  - The priest were then placed under a vow to       reveal these names.  
 
  - Then 750 of them in 1486 were to march through       the streets with candles to the church where they were told 1/5 of their       property would be taken and they could never hold public office.
 
  - By 1491, 298 people had been burned and 79       condemned to perpetual imprisonment.
 
  - 1490-1500, 75 were burnt alive and 26 dead were       exhumed and cast into the flames.
 
  - In 1500 the entire population of a city was       banished by inquisitor-general Deza.
 
  - The crimes of unorthodox faith could be refusal       to eat pork on a single occasion, visiting a house where Moorish notions       were taught, saying that the Virgin herself and not her image effected       cures
 
  - People were tortured into confession and to get       a conviction of someone else.
 
  - The water-cure: the victim was tightly bound and       stretched upon a rack with the body on an incline and the head tilted       back.  The jaws were opened and a       linen cloth stuck down the victim’s throat.  Water from a quart jar trickle through       it into his body until they held 7-8 jars.        Weights were attached to the feet and the body would be raised and       lowered to increase the pain.
 
  - Whipping, Galley labor 
 
  - By 1488 5,000 were in perpetual imprisonment.
 
  - The last case of an execution by the Spanish       Inquisition was a schoolteacher on July 26, 1826.  He was accused of being a deist and       substituting the words “Praise be to God. For “Ave Maria purissima.”  He died on the gibbet (gallows or forked       stick)  repeating the words, “I die       reconciled to God and to man.”
 
 
1512-1517     Fifth  Lateran Council (Council of Rome  V) 
  
  - Another effort  to reform the church
 
  - Included five  decrees:
 
  - Pawn shops allowed to help the poor
 
  - Permission was required to print books
 
  - Declared war on the Turks and ordered three years of  tithes on all benefices, or on all churches and church ministers
 
 
1500-1600     Protestant  Reformation 
    1483-1546     Martin  Luther 
  
    - As a 13 year old  student Luther was trained in grammar, rhetoric and logic
 
    - At 17 Luther  entered the University and received a Masters degree at 21 in 1505
 
    - Luther then  enrolled in law school but switched to philosophy but did not see the truth he  was looking for. 
 
    - That same year,  1505, Luther vowed to become a monk when he was caught in the middle of a  terrifying thunderstorm.  He cried out  for help to Saint Anna saying, “Help! Saint Anna, I will become a monk!”
 
    - Luther joined an  Augustinian monastery two weeks later.
 
    - 1507 Luther was  ordained as a priest
 
    - 1508, age25, he  taught theology at the newly opened University   of Wittenberg
 
    - In 1510 Luther  was sent to Rome  concerning the affairs of his Augustinian monastery and saw first hand the  immorality, corruption and extreme luxury of the Roman church.  He visited the famous churches, viewed the  relics and observed priests saying three or four masses in the time it took  Luther to present one back home
 
    - In 1511 at the University of Wittenberg Luther became a professor of  Bible. He studied the Bible in its original languages and lectured on the books  of the Bible:
 
   
  - 1513-1515 he taught the book of Psalms
 
  - 1515-1517 he taught the book of Romans, Galatians and  Hebrews
 
  - During this time  Martin Luther came to an understanding of salvation by faith from Romans 1:17
 
  - At this point  Luther began to hold to the three great points of his faith:
 
  - sola fide – “by faith alone” and refers to justification and  personal salvation only by faith in Jesus Christ
 
  - sola  scriptura – “by scripture alone” and  means scripture is the only inspired word of God and the only source of  authority for establishing Christian doctrine.
 
  - sola sacerdos – “by priest alone” and refers to the priesthood of  all believers in the One High Priest Jesus which is in contrast to a human  priest on earth that stands between the believer and God
 
 
  - In 1517, Johann Tetzel, a Dominican friar, came       to the Wittenberg       area to begin the sale of indulgences (the removal of sin granted by the       church to individual believers who purchased the indulgence and were given       a paper document after the purchase).        Tetzel’s motto was, “As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the       soul from purgatory springs” and taught that repentance was not necessary       since the indulgence itself provided forgiveness.  Pope Leo X needed the money for the       building of St. Peter’s Cathedral in Rome.
 
  - On October 31, 1517 Luther protested the sale of       indulgences along with several other issues he had with the Roman church       by offering a challenge to anyone who wanted to debate him on any of his       95 points of contention.  He nailed       the challenge, or the Ninety-five       Theses on the door of the Castle       Church in Wittenberg.
 
  - The Castle Church in Wittenberg in 1509 had over       5,000 church relics supposedly including bones, teeth and hair of saints,       a piece of the burning bush, soot from the fiery furnace, a piece of       Jesus’ crib, even the thumb of Jesus’ grandmother, Anne, plus the standard       relics such as a pieces of the cross and a hair from Jesus’ beard.  By 1520 the number of relics had grown       to over 19,000 that if viewed by a believer could reduce a believer’s time       in purgatory by 1.9 million days or about 5,209 years. 
 
 
1517   Martin  Luther and 95 Theses 
  
    - Below is a copy  of the letter that Martin Luther nailed on the door of the Castle Church  in Wittenberg, Germany on October 31, 1517  offering an opportunity to discuss the stated issues: 
 
   
 
  
    The Ninety-Five Theses of Martin Luther, 1517  | 
   
  
    Out of    love for the truth and from desire to elucidate it, the Reverend Father    Martin Luther, Master of Arts and Sacred Theology, and ordinary lecturer    therein at Wittenberg,    intends to defend the following statements and to dispute on them in that    place. Therefore he asks that those who cannot be present and dispute with    him orally shall do so in their absence by letter. In the name of our Lord    Jesus Christ, Amen.  
        
          - When our Lord and Master Jesus    Christ said, ``Repent'' (Mt 4:17), he willed the entire life of believers to    be one of repentance. 
 
          - This word cannot be understood as    referring to the sacrament of penance, that is, confession and satisfaction,    as administered by the clergy. 
 
          - Yet it does not mean solely inner    repentance; such inner repentance is worthless unless it produces various    outward mortification of the flesh. 
 
          - The penalty of sin remains as long    as the hatred of self (that is, true inner repentance), namely till our    entrance into the kingdom of heaven. 
 
          - The pope neither desires nor is    able to remit any penalties except those imposed by his own authority or that    of the canons. 
 
          - The pope cannot remit any guilt,    except by declaring and showing that it has been remitted by God; or, to be    sure, by remitting guilt in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right to    grant remission in these cases were disregarded, the guilt would certainly    remain unforgiven. 
 
          - God remits guilt to no one unless    at the same time he humbles him in all things and makes him submissive to the    vicar, the priest. 
 
          - The penitential canons are imposed    only on the living, and, according to the canons themselves, nothing should    be imposed on the dying. 
 
          - Therefore the Holy Spirit through    the pope is kind to us insofar as the pope in his decrees always makes    exception of the article of death and of necessity. 
 
          - Those priests act ignorantly and    wickedly who, in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penalties for    purgatory. 
 
          - Those tares of changing the    canonical penalty to the penalty of purgatory were evidently sown while the    bishops slept (Mt 13:25). 
 
          - In former times canonical    penalties were imposed, not after, but before absolution, as tests of true    contrition. 
 
          - The dying are freed by death from    all penalties, are already dead as far as the canon laws are concerned, and have    a right to be released from them. 
 
          - Imperfect piety or love on the    part of the dying person necessarily brings with it great fear; and the    smaller the love, the greater the fear. 
 
          - This fear or horror is sufficient    in itself, to say nothing of other things, to constitute the penalty of    purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair. 
 
          - Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem    to differ the same as despair, fear, and assurance of salvation. 
 
          - It seems as though for the souls    in purgatory fear should necessarily decrease and love increase. 
 
          - Furthermore, it does not seem    proved, either by reason or by Scripture, that souls in purgatory are outside    the state of merit, that is, unable to grow in love. 
 
          - Nor does it seem proved that souls    in purgatory, at least not all of them, are certain and assured of their own    salvation, even if we ourselves may be entirely certain of it. 
 
          - Therefore the pope, when he uses    the words ``plenary remission of all penalties,'' does not actually mean    ``all penalties,'' but only those imposed by himself. 
 
          - Thus those indulgence preachers    are in error who say that a man is absolved from every penalty and saved by    papal indulgences. 
 
          - As a matter of fact, the pope    remits to souls in purgatory no penalty which, according to canon law, they should    have paid in this life. 
 
          - If remission of all penalties    whatsoever could be granted to anyone at all, certainly it would be granted    only to the most perfect, that is, to very few. 
 
          - For this reason most people are    necessarily deceived by that indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of    release from penalty. 
 
          - That power which the pope has in    general over purgatory corresponds to the power which any bishop or curate    has in a particular way in his own diocese and parish. 
 
          - The pope does very well when he grants    remission to souls in purgatory, not by the power of the keys, which he does    not have, but by way of intercession for them. 
 
          - They preach only human doctrines    who say that as soon as the money clinks into the money chest, the soul flies    out of purgatory. 
 
          - It is certain that when money    clinks in the money chest, greed and avarice can be increased; but when the    church intercedes, the result is in the hands of God alone. 
 
          - Who knows whether all souls in    purgatory wish to be redeemed, since we have exceptions in St. Severinus and St. Paschal, as related in a legend. 
 
          - No one is sure of the integrity of    his own contrition, much less of having received plenary remission. 
 
          - The man who actually buys    indulgences is as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is    exceedingly rare. 
 
          - Those who believe that they can be    certain of their salvation because they have indulgence letters will be    eternally damned, together with their teachers. 
 
          - Men must especially be on guard    against those who say that the pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of    God by which man is reconciled to him. 
 
          - For the graces of indulgences are    concerned only with the penalties of sacramental satisfaction established by    man. 
 
          - They who teach that contrition is    not necessary on the part of those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory    or to buy confessional privileges preach unchristian doctrine. 
 
          - Any truly repentant Christian has    a right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without indulgence    letters. 
 
          - Any true Christian, whether living    or dead, participates in all the blessings of Christ and the church; and this    is granted him by God, even without indulgence letters. 
 
          - Nevertheless, papal remission and    blessing are by no means to be disregarded, for they are, as I have said    (Thesis 6), the proclamation of the divine remission. 
 
          - It is very difficult, even for the    most learned theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the people    the bounty of indulgences and the need of true contrition. 
 
          - A Christian who is truly contrite    seeks and loves to pay penalties for his sins; the bounty of indulgences,    however, relaxes penalties and causes men to hate them -- at least it    furnishes occasion for hating them. 
 
          - Papal indulgences must be preached    with caution, lest people erroneously think that they are preferable to other    good works of love. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    the pope does not intend that the buying of indulgences should in any way be    compared with works of mercy. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better deed than he who    buys indulgences. 
 
          - Because love grows by works of    love, man thereby becomes better. Man does not, however, become better by    means of indulgences but is merely freed from penalties. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    he who sees a needy man and passes him by, yet gives his money for    indulgences, does not buy papal indulgences but God's wrath. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that,    unless they have more than they need, they must reserve enough for their    family needs and by no means squander it on indulgences. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    they buying of indulgences is a matter of free choice, not commanded. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    the pope, in granting indulgences, needs and thus desires their devout prayer    more than their money. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    papal indulgences are useful only if they do not put their trust in them, but    very harmful if they lose their fear of God because of them. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    if the pope knew the exactions of the indulgence preachers, he would rather    that the basilica of St. Peter were burned to ashes than built up with the    skin, flesh, and bones of his sheep. 
 
          - Christians are to be taught that    the pope would and should wish to give of his own money, even though he had    to sell the basilica of St. Peter, to many of those from whom certain hawkers    of indulgences cajole money. 
 
          - It is vain to trust in salvation    by indulgence letters, even though the indulgence commissary, or even the    pope, were to offer his soul as security. 
 
          - They are the enemies of Christ and    the pope who forbid altogether the preaching of the Word of God in some    churches in order that indulgences may be preached in others. 
 
          - Injury is done to the Word of God    when, in the same sermon, an equal or larger amount of time is devoted to    indulgences than to the Word. 
 
          - It is certainly the pope's    sentiment that if indulgences, which are a very insignificant thing, are    celebrated with one bell, one procession, and one ceremony, then the gospel,    which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a hundred bells, a    hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies. 
 
          - The true treasures of the church,    out of which the pope distributes indulgences, are not sufficiently discussed    or known among the people of Christ. 
 
          - That indulgences are not temporal    treasures is certainly clear, for many indulgence sellers do not distribute    them freely but only gather them. 
 
          - Nor are they the merits of Christ    and the saints, for, even without the pope, the latter always work grace for    the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outer man. 
 
          - St. Lawrence said that the poor of    the church were the treasures of the church, but he spoke according to the    usage of the word in his own time. 
 
          - Without want of consideration we    say that the keys of the church, given by the merits of Christ, are that    treasure. 
 
          - For it is clear that the pope's    power is of itself sufficient for the remission of penalties and cases    reserved by himself. 
 
          - The true treasure of the church is    the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God. 
 
          - But this treasure is naturally    most odious, for it makes the first to be last (Mt. 20:16). 
 
          - On the other hand, the treasure of    indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be first. 
 
          - Therefore the treasures of the    gospel are nets with which one formerly fished for men of wealth. 
 
          - The treasures of indulgences are    nets with which one now fishes for the wealth of men. 
 
          - The indulgences which the    demagogues acclaim as the greatest graces are actually understood to be such    only insofar as they promote gain. 
 
          - They are nevertheless in truth the    most insignificant graces when compared with the grace of God and the piety    of the cross. 
 
          - Bishops and curates are bound to    admit the commissaries of papal indulgences with all reverence. 
 
          - But they are much more bound to    strain their eyes and ears lest these men preach their own dreams instead of    what the pope has commissioned. 
 
          - Let him who speaks against the    truth concerning papal indulgences be anathema and accursed. 
 
          - But let him who guards against the    lust and license of the indulgence preachers be blessed. 
 
          - Just as the pope justly thunders    against those who by any means whatever contrive harm to the sale of    indulgences. 
 
          - Much more does he intend to    thunder against those who use indulgences as a pretext to contrive harm to    holy love and truth. 
 
          - To consider papal indulgences so    great that they could absolve a man even if he had done the impossible and    had violated the mother of God is madness. 
 
          - We say on the contrary that papal    indulgences cannot remove the very least of venial sins as far as guilt is    concerned. 
 
          - To say that even St. Peter if he    were now pope, could not grant greater graces is blasphemy against St. Peter    and the pope. 
 
          - We say on the contrary that even the    present pope, or any pope whatsoever, has greater graces at his disposal,    that is, the gospel, spiritual powers, gifts of healing, etc., as it is    written. (1 Co 12[:28]) 
 
          - To say that the cross emblazoned    with the papal coat of arms, and set up by the indulgence preachers is equal    in worth to the cross of Christ is blasphemy. 
 
          - The bishops, curates, and    theologians who permit such talk to be spread among the people will have to    answer for this. 
 
          - This unbridled preaching of    indulgences makes it difficult even for learned men to rescue the reverence    which is due the pope from slander or from the shrewd questions of the laity. 
 
          - Such as: ``Why does not the pope    empty purgatory for the sake of holy love and the dire need of the souls that    are there if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable    money with which to build a church?'' The former reason would be most just;    the latter is most trivial. 
 
          - Again, ``Why are funeral and    anniversary masses for the dead continued and why does he not return or    permit the withdrawal of the endowments founded for them, since it is wrong    to pray for the redeemed?'' 
 
          - Again, ``What is this new piety of    God and the pope that for a consideration of money they permit a man who is    impious and their enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a friend of    God and do not rather, beca use of the need of that pious and beloved soul,    free it for pure love's sake?'' 
 
          - Again, ``Why are the penitential    canons, long since abrogated and dead in actual fact and through disuse, now    satisfied by the granting of indulgences as though they were still alive and    in force?'' 
 
          - Again, ``Why does not the pope,    whose wealth is today greater than the wealth of the richest Crassus, build    this one basilica of St. Peter with his own money rather than with the money    of poor believers?'' 
 
          - Again, ``What does the pope remit    or grant to those who by perfect contrition already have a right to full    remission and blessings?'' 
 
          - Again, ``What greater blessing    could come to the church than if the pope were to bestow these remissions and    blessings on every believer a hundred times a day, as he now does but once?'' 
 
          - ``Since the pope seeks the    salvation of souls rather than money by his indulgences, why does he suspend    the indulgences and pardons previously granted when they have equal    efficacy?'' 
 
          - To repress these very sharp    arguments of the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving    reasons, is to expose the church and the pope to the ridicule of their    enemies and to make Christians unhappy. 
 
          - If, therefore, indulgences were    preached according to the spirit and intention of the pope, all these doubts    would be readily resolved. Indeed, they would not exist. 
 
          - Away, then, with all those    prophets who say to the people of Christ, ``Peace, peace,'' and there is no    peace! (Jer 6:14) 
 
          - Blessed be all those prophets who    say to the people of Christ, ``Cross, cross,'' and there is no cross! 
 
          - Christians should be exhorted to    be diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, death and    hell. 
 
          - And thus be confident of entering    into heaven through many tribulations rather than through the false security    of peace (Acts 14:22). 
 
          | 
   
 
1518-1521     Luther  Breaks with Rome 
  
    - After 95 theses  the Dominican monk Tetzel tried to silence Luther with all the power of the  Dominicans and with help of the Augustinian order
 
    - The reformation  was then early called a squabble of monks.
 
    - Luther was  ordered to argue his position in a debate with his own order of monks.  
 
    - Result:  More monks accepted Luther’s ideas
 
   
 
1516-1605     Swiss  Reformation 
1518   Diet of Augsburg 
  - Luther met with Cardinal Cajetan who demanded       Luther to retract
 
  - Luther’s response:    
 
 
  - Only when proven by scripture
 
  - Denied pope final authority in faith
 
  - Denied sacraments had any power without faith.
 
 
1519   Debate  with John Eck 
  - Eck cleverly forced Luther to admit
 
 
  - fallibility of a council
 
  - his unwillingness to accept popes decisions
 
  - That many of Hus’ ideas were valid
 
 
1520   Luther  decides to go to German People 
  - Luther publishes three writings:
 
 
  -  “Address to  German Nobility”
 
  - it was an attack  on the hierarchy of the Catholic Church
 
  - Luther used  scripture to demolish three strengths of church:            
    
      
        - 1-  Popes  authority over temporal powers
 
        - 2- Pope alone could  interpret scripture
 
        - 3- Only pope could call  a council
 
       
     
   
 
  - Luther proved  with scripture these four things:
 
 
                        1- all believers were  priest 
                          2- Pope should not  interfere with temporal affairs 
                          3- all believers could  interpret scripture 
                          4- believers could  choose their ministers 
  - “Babylonian Captivity
 
  - Luther  challenged the sacramental system of Roman Church
 
  - “The freedom of Christian Man”
 
  - Attacked the theology of the Roman Church
 
 
  - Luther had attacked the Hierarchy, the       sacraments and the theology of the Roman Catholic Church in these three       books to the German people.
 
  - Luther was appealing his nation for a national       reform.
 
 
June 1520     Pope  Leo X issued the Bull resulting in excommunication of Luther 
  - Luther’s books where burned
 
  - Luther burned Leo’s bull
 
 
1521   Diet of Worms 
  - Luther went under protection of Frederick the       elector of Saxony and founder of Wittenberg
 
  - Luther was told to recant
 
  - Luther said only with scripture or reason
 
  - Luther said, “Here I stand, so help me God.”
 
  - On his return to Wittenberg his friends kidnapped him and       took him to the Wartburg castle until 1522
 
  - After leaving Worms the diet issued an order to seize       Luther and hand him over.
 
  - They banned his writings
 
 
1521-1522     Luther  translates German Bible 
  - Luther used Erasmus’ GNT to complete his German       translation
 
  - This set the standard for the German language       for years
 
  - Luther also wrote “On Monastic Vows” where he       urged monks and nuns to repudiate their wrongful vows, to leave the       cloister and marry.
 
 
1522   Zwickau Prophets arrive at  Wittenburg 
  - While Luther was hidden in the Wartburg castle       Nicholas Storch and Markus Stubner showed up in Wittenburg.
 
  - They claimed to be prophets
 
  - They began preaching the Anabaptists’ ideas       (“ana” means “again, twice” and refers to believers who were being       baptized a second time as an adult after having been baptized into the C atholic       church as an infant)
 
  - They taught the kingdom of God       would soon appear
 
  - Their followers would have special revelations
 
  - Luther risked his life, left the castle and       returned to Wittenberg       to preach 8 fiery sermons.
 
  - In these sermons he:
 
 
  - defeated the prophets
 
  - stressed the authority of the Bible
 
  - stressed the need for gradual change in the church
 
 
1525   Anabaptists  in Europe 
1531   King  Henry VIII (1491-1547) 
  - King Henry VII becomes king of England in       1509.  England is a Roman Catholic       country controlled by the pope
 
  - King Henry wants a divorce from his first wife       but the Roman church refused 
 
  - In 1531 Henry VII becomes head of church of       England and gives grants himself a divorce
 
  - 1933 Henry VIII marries Anne Boleyn
 
 
1535   Luther  breaks completely with the Anabaptist movement 
  - The radical wing of the reformation lost       confidence in Luther
 
  - Luther rejects the Anabaptist extreme views
 
  - The humanist and Erasmus (their leader) broke       with Luther when they saw he was breaking with Rome
 
  - The German peasants became hostile to Luther       (1525) when he opposed the peasants revolt.
 
 
-  the peasants had applied his teaching of  individual priesthood to the civil authorities and revolted against the  government. 
1531   The  protestant princes organized forming the Schmalkaldic League 
  - They agreed to defend their faith by war if       needed
 
  - They would not need to until 1546
 
 
1535   The  Lutheran order of ordination 
  - The official ecclesiastical break with Rome occurred 
 
 
   
  
KEY POINTS (back to the top)  
OTHER SITES (back to the top) 
BOOKS  from Galyn's Shelf: (back to the top)  
QUESTIONS  (back to the top)  
 
  
 |